Dr. rer. nat. Sebastian Reiter

Department Manager

Werdegang

Sebastian Reiter studied computer science at the University Karlsruhe (TH) from 8/2002 to 3/2008. Research focus was the design of embedded systems and computer architectures, telematics and systems engineering. The topic of his diploma thesis was "Design and Implementation of an Array-Based Data Path Concept for Autonomous Realization of DSP Algorithms".

From 8/2008 to 3/2010 he worked as a system developer at the XTRONIC GmbH. His work included the conception and design of test equipment for the automotive domain.

Since 4/2010 he is a research assistant in the department SiM.

Research interests:

• Reliability analysis of embedded systems
• System simulation e.g. using SystemC
• Automotive bus systems (MOST, CAN, FlexRay)

Publications

Articles (9)

1. Constraint-basierte Plattformvarianten-Spezifikation für die frühzeitige SystemverifikationDetails

   Andreas Burger, Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel , 2016

2. Wie sich MOST Geräte im Fahrzeug mittels UPnP steuern lassenDetails

   Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2015

3. Evaluation Framework for MOST Based Driver Assistance Systems Based on Virtual PrototypesDetails

   Jyoti Joshi, Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2014

4. MOST Network and System: Virtual Prototypes – Evaluation Framework for MOST-based ADASDetails

   Jyoti Joshi, Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2013

5. MOST Basierte Fahrerassistenzsysteme Virtuelle EvaluierungDetails

   Jyoti Joshi, Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2013

6. Reliability analysis of a MOST based advanced driver assistance system using virtual prototypesDetails

   Sebastian Reiter, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel , 2012

7. Reliability analysis of a MOST based advanced driver assistance system using virtual prototypesDetails

   Sebastian Reiter, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2012

8. Virtuelles Prototyping stellt Zuverlässigkeit sicherDetails

   Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2012

9. Automatisierte Leistungsevaluierung des MOST-High-Protokolls mittels Virtueller Prototypen Details

   Sebastian Reiter, Andreas Braun, Rico Hauke, Alexander Leonhardi, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel , 2011

Conference Proceedings (18)

1. Bridging XML and UML - An Automated FrameworkDetails

   Arthur Kühlwein, Sebastian Reiter, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, Oliver Bringmann, 2019

2. Model-guided Security Analysis of Interconnected Embedded SystemsDetails

   Yasamin Mahmoodi and Sebastian Reiter and Alexander Viehl and Oliver Bringmann and Wolfgang Rosenstiel, SciTePress, 2018

3. Verification of Component Fault Trees Using Error Effect SimulationsInfoDetails

   Reiter, Sebastian and Zeller, Marc and Höfig, Kai and Viehl, Alexander and Bringmann, Oliver and Rosenstiel, Wolfgang, Springer International Publishing, 2017

   The growing complexity of safety-relevant systems causes an increasing effort for safety assurance. The reduction of development costs and time-to-market, while guaranteeing safe operation, is therefore a major challenge. In order to enable efficient safety assessment of complex architectures, we present an approach, which combines deductive safety analyses, in form of Component Fault Trees (CFTs), with an Error Effect Simulation (EES) for sanity checks. The combination reduces the drawbacks of both analyses, such as the subjective failure propagation assumptions in the CFTs or the determination of relevant fault scenarios for the EES. Both CFTs and the EES provide a modular, reusable and compositional safety analysis and are applicable throughout the whole design process. They support continuous model refinement and the reuse of conducted safety analysis and simulation models. Hence, safety goal violations can be identified in early design stages and the reuse of conducted safety analyses reduces the overhead for safety assessment.

4. Combining Graph-based Guidance with Error Effect Simulation for Efficient Safety AnalysisDetails

   Jo Laufenberg, Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Thomas Kropf, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2016

5. Fault Injection Ecosystem for Assisted Safety Validation of Automotive SystemsDetails

   Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2016

6. Constraint-based Platform Variant Specification for Early System VerificationDetails

   Andreas Burger, Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel , 2016

7. Systemmodellierung zur FehlereffektsimulationInfoDetails

   Andreas Burger, Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2015

   Funktionale Sicherheit gewinnt in der Entwicklung elektrischer/elektronischer Systeme im Kraftfahrzeug immer mehr an Bedeutung. Insbesondere die steigende Systemkomplexität erhöht den Aufwand zur Durchführung und Dokumentation simulationsgestützter Zuverlässigkeitsanalysen. Der in dieser Arbeit vorgestellte modell-basierte Ansatz zur Spezifikation und Ableitung von Simulationsmodellen reduziert den manuellen Aufwand von simulationsgestützten Analysen erheblich. Mittels des modellgetriebenen Entwicklungsansatzes wird eine ganzheitliche Schnittstelle zwischen der Zuverlässigkeitsbeurteilung und den Systemsimulationen geschaffen. Der Einsatz dieser Methodik und dem darüber liegenden Framework wird beispielhaft an einer Evaluierung der Fehlerrobustheit einer Applikation zur Verkehrszeichenerkennung gezeigt.

8. Fehlereffektsimulation mittels virtueller PrototypenDetails

   S. Reiter, M. Becker, O. Bringmann, A. Burger, et al., 2015

9. A Performance Evaluation Framework for MOST Ethernet supported by Virtual Prototyping TechnologyDetails

   Alexander Koch, Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2015

10. White-Box Error Effect Simulation for Assisted Safety AnalysisInfoDetails

    Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2015

    This paper presents an approach on extending virtual prototyping, commonly used for system verification and design space exploration, for safety analysis. Virtual prototyping will enhance safety analysis, overcoming the challenges resulting from the ever-increasing number of safety-related, complex, interconnected electronic systems. The presented integral fault injection framework enables safety analysis in combination with established system verification methods. It consists of a fault behavior specification methodology and the corresponding, reusable injection tool, with focus on seamless applicability in between functional models in early concept phases and low-level structural models in late design phases. Our approach works with third party compilers and simulators while providing a minimal intrusive approach using existing models. Selected use cases at gate, register-transfer and functional level demonstrate the usage of the approach.

11. Graph Guided Error Effect SimulationDetails

    Jo Laufenberg, Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2015

12. Virtual Prototyping Evaluation Framework for Automotive Embedded Systems EngineeringInfoDetails

    Sebastian Reiter, Andreas Burger, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2014

    This paper presents an analysis framework based on virtual prototyping to support the comprehensive evaluation of distributed, network based automotive applications. The framework enables functional and timing verification, performance and reliability analysis while reducing its complexity. Additionally the framework supports design space exploration of the overall system, considering target hardware/software and the system environment. The presented approach closes the evaluation gap between the initial design and the final system integration test. During the whole design process the analysis supports the designers in reaching eficient design decisions. The applicability of the proposed framework is demonstrated with the help of representative automotive use cases. Highlighted are benefits like the integration of existing software prototypes or the automation capability. The performance comparison with a widely used network simulation tool shows the competitiveness of the presented analysis framework.

13. UPnP Enables Universal Control of In-vehicle MOST DevicesDetails

    Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2014

14. Safety Evaluation of Automotive Electronics Using Virtual Prototypes: State of the Art and Research ChallengesInfoDetails

    J.-H. Oetjens et al., ACM, 2014

    Intelligent automotive electronics significantly improved driving safety in the last decades. With the increasing complexity of automotive systems, dependability of the electronic components themselves and of their interaction must be assured to avoid any risk to driving safety due to unexpected failures caused by internal or external faults. Additionally, Virtual Prototypes (VPs) have been accepted in many areas of system development processes in the automotive industry as platforms for SW development, verification, and design space exploration. We believe that VPs will significantly contribute to the analysis of safety conditions for automotive electronics. This paper shows the advantages of such a methodology based on today's industrial needs, presents the current state of the art in this field, and outlines upcoming research challenges that need to be addressed to make this vision a reality.

15. Reliability assessment of safety-relevant automotive systems in a model-based design flowInfoDetails

    Sebastian Reiter, Michael Pressler, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2013

    To support the reliability assessment of safetyrelevant distributed automotive systems and reduce its complexity, this paper presents a novel approach that extends virtual prototyping towards error effect simulation. Besides the common functional and timed system simulation, error injection is used to stress error tolerance mechanisms. A quantitative assessment of the overall system reliability is performed by observing the system reactions and identifying incorrect system behavior. To foster the industrial application, the analysis is integrated in a model-based design flow, starting at the modeling level to assemble and parameterize the virtual prototype and to configure the analysis. The feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated by analyzing a representative safety-relevant automotive use case.

16. Virtual Prototypes – Evaluation Framework for MOST-based Driver Assistance SystemsDetails

    Jyoti Joshi, Sebastian Reiter, Alexander Viehl, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, 2013

17. Reliability analysis of a MOST based advanced driver assistance system using virtual prototypesDetails

    Sebastian Reiter, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel , 2012

18. Automated Performance Evaluation of the MOST High Protocol Using Virtual PrototypesDetails

    Sebastian Reiter, Andreas Braun, Rico Hauke, Alexander Leonhardi, Oliver Bringmann, Wolfgang Rosenstiel , 2011

Export search result as .bib

Kontakt

Telefon: +49 721 9654-430
E-Mail: sreiter@dont-want-spam.fzi.de

Back